-
Número necessário para tratar (NNT) para evitar uma recorrência de tumor estromal gastrointestinal (GIST) no Brasil Análise de comparação de custos e impacto orçamentário do tratamento adjuvante com imatinibe
- Voltar
Título
Número necessário para tratar (NNT) para evitar uma recorrência de tumor estromal gastrointestinal (GIST) no Brasil Análise de comparação de custos e impacto orçamentário do tratamento adjuvante com imatinibe
Tipo de documento
Apresentação
Descrição
Resumo apresentado na The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)
Fonte
ISPOR
Ano de publicação
2009
Referência (Vancouver)
Valentim J, Coombs J, Sakano A, Puty F. Number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) recurrence in Brazil cost comparison and budget impact analysis of adjuvant treatment with imatinib [Internet]. In: ISPOR Europe 2009; Paris, France. Disponível em: https\://www\.ispor.org/heor-resources/presentations-database/presentation/ispor-12th-annual-european-congress/number-needed-to-treat-nnt-to-avoid-one-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumour-gist-recurrence-in-brazil-cost-comparison-and-budget-impact-analysis-of-adjuvant-treatment-with-imatinib
Identificador
2009ISPOR008
Title
Number Needed to Treat (NNT) to Avoid One Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor (GIST) Recurrence in Brazil: Cost Comparison and Budget Impact Analysis of Adjuvant Treatment with Imatinib
Document type
Presentation
Description
Abstract presented at The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR)
Source
ISPOR
Publication year
2009
Reference (Vancouver)
Valentim J, Coombs J, Sakano A, Puty F. Number needed to treat (NNT) to avoid one gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) recurrence in Brazil cost comparison and budget impact analysis of adjuvant treatment with imatinib [Internet]. In: ISPOR Europe 2009; Paris, France. Available from: https\://www\.ispor.org/heor-resources/presentations-database/presentation/ispor-12th-annual-european-congress/number-needed-to-treat-nnt-to-avoid-one-gastrointestinal-stromal-tumour-gist-recurrence-in-brazil-cost-comparison-and-budget-impact-analysis-of-adjuvant-treatment-with-imatinib
Identifier
2009ISPOR008
Resumo
Objetivos: Calcular o Número Necessário para Tratar (NNT) para evitar a recorrência de GIST após ressecção, comparar o custo do tratamento adjuvante com imatinibe (IM) com o custo da recorrência, e estimar o impacto orçamentário sob a perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) do Brasil. Métodos: Utilizamos a redução relativa de risco disponível após 1 ano do ensaio clínico Z9001 e a taxa histórica de recorrência sem tratamento adjuvante para estimar a redução absoluta de risco e o NNT. O efeito do tratamento adjuvante foi extrapolado para um período de 3 anos, dado que ensaios em curso investigam durações de tratamento mais longas (SSG XVIII). Um horizonte temporal de 5 anos foi estabelecido para a comparação de custos e para a Análise de Impacto Orçamentário (BIA). O Custo Incremental para Evitar a Recorrência (ICAR) foi definido como a diferença entre o custo do tratamento adjuvante
Notas
O registro foi originalmente publicado em inglês. A versão em português foi traduzida com o apoio de inteligência artificial.
Abstract
Objetives: To calculate the NNT to avoid a recurrence of GIST after resection, to compare the cost of adjuvant treatment with imatinib (IM) with the cost of recurrence, and to estimate a budget impact from the Brazilian Public Health Care System (SUS) perspective. Methods: Available relative risk reduction at 1 year from the Z9001 clinical trial and historical rate of recurrence for no adjuvant treatment were applied to estimate absolute risk reduction and NNT. Adjuvant treatment effect was extrapolated to 3-year period as ongoing trials are investigating longer treatment duration (SSG XVIII). A 5-year time horizon was set for cost comparison and Budget Impact Analysis (BIA). Incremental Cost to Avoid Recurrence (ICAR) was defined as the difference between the cost of adjuvant treatment (IM, monitoring) and the cost of recurrence (IM, surgery, monitoring, best supportive care). ICAR was applied to adjuvant GIST incidence for BIA. Epidemiological data (incidence, proportion of resectables); health access, diagnosis and expected adjuvant treatment rates were obtained from literature. Resource utilization and cost data came from official guideline and administrative databases, literature and expert opinion. Costs are reported in 2007 Euros. A 5% discount rate was applied. Univariate sensitivity analysis was performed. Results: The NNT to avoid a recurrence was estimated at 2.1 based on extrapolated GIST recurrence risk profile in Brazil. Cost of adjuvant treatment was €50,298 and the cost of a recurrence €61,998. Annual ICAR was €8,725. The annual impact on the Ministry of Health budget was 0.01%, which included impact on infrastructure (e.g. monitoring costs) of SUS. Results were sensitive to the recurrence rate and adjuvant treatment duration. Conclusions: Considering that imatinib is already reimbursed by SUS for metastatic/unresectable GIST, adjuvant therapy for primary GIST represents good value for money for the prevention of recurrence, and an annual budget impact of 0.01%.
Notes
The record was originally published in English. The Portuguese version was translated with the aid of artificial intelligence.