-
Avaliação da conciliação medicamentosa na admissão de pacientes em um hospital privado
- Voltar
Título
Avaliação da conciliação medicamentosa na admissão de pacientes em um hospital privado
Tipo de documento
Resumo
Descrição
Resumo apresentado no 14º Fórum Brasileiro sobre Assistência Farmacêutica e Farmacoeconomia (FAFF) e publicado no Jornal de Assistência Farmacêutica e Farmacoeconomia (JAFF)
Fonte
JAFF
Ano de publicação
2026
Referência (Vancouver)
Castro CLD, Pastori LDM, Santos Júnior GO. Avaliação da conciliação medicamentosa na admissão de pacientes em um hospital privado. J Assist Farmac Farmacoecon. 2026;11.
Identificador
2026JAFF123
Title
Evaluation of Medication Reconciliation at Patient Admission in a Private Hospital
Document type
Abstract
Description
Abstract presented at the 14th Brazilian Forum on Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmacoeconomics (FAFF) and published in the Journal of Pharmaceutical Care and Pharmacoeconomics (JAFF)
Source
JAFF
Publication year
2026
Identifier
2026JAFF123
Resumo
Introduction: Medication reconciliation is an important patient safety strategy that consists of comparing a patient's preadmission medication list with prescriptions during transitions of care, identifying discrepancies, and communicating changes to reduce medication errors. Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of medication reconciliation in identifying and resolving medication discrepancies at the admission of adult patients to a private hospital. Methods: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitário Edgard Santos under opinion number 7,367,654, in accordance with Resolution No. 466/2012. This was a prospective observational study conducted from February to March 2025 at a private hospital in Salvador, Bahia. Patients aged ≥18 years, using at least one chronic medication before admission, and admitted to selected hospital units were included through convenience sampling. The Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) was obtained by the hospital's clinical pharmacy team using a standardized form, comparing preadmission medications with initial hospital prescriptions. Discrepancies were classified as intentional, undocumented intentional, or unintentional. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classes involved were identified, pharmaceutical interventions were recorded, and their acceptance by the medical team was evaluated. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results and Conclusion: A total of 133 patients were included (mean age 60.6 ± 19.3 years; 72.9% female). Among 806 preadmission medications, 332 discrepancies (41.2%) were identified: 133 (40.1%) intentional, 148 (44.6%) undocumented intentional, and 51 (15.4%) unintentional, corresponding to a mean of 0.38 ± 0.80 unintentional discrepancies per patient. Most unintentional discrepancies were medication omissions (90.1%), and the most frequently involved ATC classes were cardiovascular system drugs (29.4%) and alimentary tract and metabolism drugs (17.7%). Patients taking more than six medications had a higher rate of unintentional discrepancies (1.69 ± 1.25 per patient). Of the 43 pharmaceutical interventions performed, 86% were accepted by the medical team. Medication reconciliation proved effective in detecting and correcting medication discrepancies at hospital admission, with a high acceptance rate of pharmaceutical interventions. These findings highlight the need to standardize documentation of therapeutic decisions and prioritize patients receiving polypharmacy to optimize patient safety.
Palavras-chave
Discrepâncias medicamentosas não intencionais | Pharmaceutical care | Reconciliação medicamentosa | Segurança do paciente
Notas
O registro foi originalmente publicado em português. A versão em inglês foi traduzida com o apoio de inteligência artificial.
Abstract
Introduction: Medication reconciliation is an important patient safety strategy that involves comparing a patient's preadmission medication list with medication orders during transitions of care, identifying discrepancies, and communicating changes to reduce medication errors. Objective: This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of medication reconciliation in identifying and resolving medication discrepancies at the admission of adult patients to a private hospital. Methods: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitário Edgard Santos under opinion number 7,367,654, in accordance with Resolution No. 466/2012. This prospective observational study was conducted between February and March 2025 at a private hospital in Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Patients aged ≥18 years, receiving at least one chronic medication before admission, and admitted to selected hospital units were included through convenience sampling. The Best Possible Medication History (BPMH) was obtained by the hospital's clinical pharmacy team using a standardized form, comparing preadmission medications with initial hospital prescriptions. Discrepancies were classified as intentional, undocumented intentional, or unintentional. The Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system was used to categorize the medications involved, pharmaceutical interventions were documented, and their acceptance by the medical team was assessed. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Results and Conclusion: A total of 133 patients were included (mean age 60.6 ± 19.3 years; 72.9% female). Among 806 preadmission medications, 332 discrepancies (41.2%) were identified: 133 (40.1%) intentional, 148 (44.6%) undocumented intentional, and 51 (15.4%) unintentional, corresponding to a mean of 0.38 ± 0.80 unintentional discrepancies per patient. Most unintentional discrepancies were medication omissions (90.1%), and the most frequently involved ATC classes were cardiovascular system drugs (29.4%) and alimentary tract and metabolism drugs (17.7%). Patients taking more than six medications experienced a higher rate of unintentional discrepancies (1.69 ± 1.25 per patient). Of the 43 pharmaceutical interventions performed, 86% were accepted by the medical team. Medication reconciliation proved effective in detecting and correcting medication discrepancies at hospital admission, with a high acceptance rate of pharmaceutical interventions. These findings highlight the need to standardize documentation of therapeutic decisions and prioritize patients receiving polypharmacy in order to further enhance patient safety.
Keywords
Medication reconciliation | Patient safety | Pharmaceutical care | Unintended Medication Discrepancies
Notes
The record was originally published in Portuguese. The English version was translated with the support of artificial intelligence.